THE POISONED CHALICE
A poisoned chalice is something that seems good at first (a beautiful cup filled with delectable wine) but after the person accepts the cup and drinks from it he or she discovers that it is poisoned. This has strong similarities to the “white elephant tactic”. However, the difference lies in the objective of the tactician and the awareness of the target. In the case of the “poisoned chalice” the objective is the swift and covert destruction of an opponent while with the “White Elephant” it is to create a burden that ultimately exhausts the opponent – but is one they cannot refuse. In short, they are aware that they are being targeted but are powerless to prevent it. One tactic is swift; the other lengthy.
“Bloody instructions, which, being taught, return
to plague the inventor; this even-handed justice
commends the ingredients of our poison’d chalice
to our own lips. He’s here in double trust:”
This is one the earliest (and clearest) references we’ve been able to find tho the poisoned chalice and is dated to circa 1600. It is an extract from one of William Shakespeare’s tragedies – Macbeth.
However, the origin of the name probably predates this record by 1570 years.
“And as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and blessed it, and broke it, and gave it to the disciples, and said, 'Take, eat; this is My body.' And He took the cup, (chalice) and gave thanks and gave it to them, saying, 'Drink ye all of it; for this is My blood of the New Testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.” (Matthew 26.26-28.) “This do in remembrance of me.”
In biblical terms the whole of Jesus’ life was a “Poisoned Chalice”. He was given a great and glorious task by his father “God” (if Christian) to save mankind. However, it would also mean his mortal and painful death as proof of his divinity. (How can you be resurrected if not first dead?) One of his last acts is to drink from a chalice while knowing that he has already been betrayed.
As there has recently been so much publicity relating to Dan Brown’s “the Da Vinci Code” we feel it is necessary to mention that this tactic has nothing to do with either religion or the numerous conspiracy theories that are now commonplace. It is a reference to the origin of a tactic – nothing more.
A further reference to this tactical concept comes (allegedly) from Saint Benedict of Nursia (born in Nursia Italy c. 480 - died c. 547) a founder of Christian monastic communities. The idea was referred to in one of his exorcisms, found on the Saint Benedict Medal:
“Vade retro Satana! Nunquam suade mihi vana! Sunt mala quae libas. Ipse venena bibas!” |